POSTULATE GOD'S EXISTENCE |
||||||||||||
To understand this passage could be necessary to read the previous one on the same subject. (click here if you wanto to read it) , the content of which we summarize here for convenience. Introduction statement: Using the Aristotelian definitions of SUBSISTENCY, RELEVANCE, ACCIDENT, we say that we know the content of the material universe by coming into contact with accidents which are its manifestation. It's very important therefore that must not be confused each other the accidental and the substantial. The relationship between substance and accident is real-modal. Postulate : accordingly the introduction statement let's postulate that the matter (the accidents) is NOT eternal, and that all its elementary components, those that make up atoms are the result of a transformation of energy..
Inference : The fact that the matter is not eternal, does it mean that the classic spacial dimensions aren't enough to describe the universe, and that there's at least another dimension that allows us to conceive its non-eternity. Recent scientific knowledges: physical theories tell us that there was not only one 'big bang', but many, and scattered through our universe. Matter and time has been created just at 'the big bang' instant. The continuum space-time has been created with it's four dimensions height z, width,x, width y, and TIME.. In the so said "annus mirabiliis", that is the year 1915, the Great scientist Albert Einstein formulated and publicated his own relativity theory. He demonstated both theoretically and practically that an objetc moving with increasig speed has the property of deformating this continuum space-time, increasing his own mass and shortening his own time. He also demonstated that the equivalence matter-energy with the famous E = mc^2 equivalence. and the others. The more simple one of these equations is
Now I hear on television cultural broadcasting a scientist saying that at the big-bang moment there was nothing and because beeing an atheist he said that the big-bang happened randomnessly (?), for something as misterious concentration of energy in some focuses point. (?) I don't agree about that, because
ENERGY TRANSFORMATION Then there was only one of the speeches of the uppersaid scientist that i found coherent: when he said that in the whole universe the energy balance is zero. In fact he said that presumably the amount of matter and anti-matter are the same, and this is the reason why the total amount energy in our universe is 0. This fact says us that other universes,could exists in other dimensions. WHE CAN SAY THEN THAT THE MATTER ITSELF HAS BEEN CREATED AND NOT GENERATED OR PRODUCED CONCLUSIONS: my poor opinin of ignorant and rough engineer is
All the upperdsaid is which suggests at the universe origin itself has begun by a voluntary act, and thererefore rational. is is true even more, given that the physical laws that govern inflexibly and rationally e universe cannot be derived but by GOD who created the universe whose total energy balance is ZERO..
|
||||||||||||