Quos Deus perdere vult
dementat prius

 
It was believed that the COVID19 pandemic would cause the rebirth of rationality and the abandonment of measures taken on the basis of ideological or religious convictions, BUT

«Those that God wants to lose first He removes their reason»

THE GLASGOW CLIMATE CONFERENCE (2021)

For the first time, after the Glasgow conference, the climate conference of this year 2021, I feel that I can partially agree with the small and very ignorant Greta Thumberg: apparently the great ones of the Earth have not understood the problem.
 They only blah, blah blah!

Stefano Pelloni
  BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH, & BLAH!

I agree with her, yes, but not for the same reasons that this silly girl talks about, who always shows herself with an altered and haughty face.

First of all, it would be cruel to force the peoples of CHINA and INDIA, who together are almost half of the human race, to give up their current main source of energy, if it could be done at all.

To deprive India and China of their main sources of energy would be criminal, because hundreds of millions of people would suffer and millions of poor people would die starving, who instead have the right to aspire to a life worthy of the name, more than that ignorant girl whose name is Greta. It is equally foolish to think that the problems of emerging Africa can be approached in the same way.

Little Greta lives in a nation populated by four cats, she has a comfortable and warm life, she eats every day, and she cannot understand the life of those countries, for example the mainland China, like me, who have been and worked there in past century.
Who and for what purpose someone did pull Greta out of his magician hat like a rabbit to say so many wonderful nonsense all together, nobody knows.
I still don't think that this girl has ever seen some hungry people sucking on a gnawed chicken bone, rummaging through garbage, or leaning unconscious from hunger against a wall, as I saw once.
It is not known for what purpose, but one can imagine in favor of what interests, a little girl would allow herself to insult the great ones of the earth from the top of the mountain of her immeasurable ignorance and inexperience of real life.

GLOBAL WARMING IS UNSTOPPABLE, AS ARE THE NATURAL MOVEMENTS OF OUR PLANET AND OF THE WHOLE SOLAR SYSTEM, AND MANKIND CAN DO LITTLE OR NOTHING.
In fact, it is these factors that over the centuries sometimes cause glaciations and sometimes overheating of the planet. Eruptions, earthquakes and bradyseisms, the telluric movements that raise or lower the level of the earth, and also the drift of the continents cant-be stopped..

Second, I think it is stupid to spend money and energy on very expensive and almost useless things, REAL GADGETS, like solar panels and wind blades.
It is true that humanity is responsible for the environmental pollution caused - in a broad sense - by its waste, BUT IT IS NOT OR AT LEAST IT SEEMS CLEAR THAT this is NOT IN RELATION TO GLOBAL WARMING.
In this Ichicawa diagram, the natural factors indicated as A, B, C, which are unstoppable, are presented; in fact, MANKIND can only adapt to changes in temperature and configuration of the planet, in particular to the immeasurable ones caused by factors A and B.
You don't need an expert in geology or paleontology to understand this. Only little Greta doesn't understand it, because like many, too many people, she doesn't know anything about it and therefore she can't ..


AS THE NUMBER OF HUMAN BEINGS CONTINUOUSLY INCREASES, THE REAL PROBLEM IS ONLY ONE: ENERGY AVAILABILITY
TO AVOID A DYSTOPIAN FUTURE LIKE THE ONE FORECAST IN CERTAIN CATASTROPHIC MOVIES, AND TO DO WHAT REALLY NEEDS TO BE DONE, IT IS NECESSARY TO AVOID IRRATIONALITY AND TAKE THE RIGHT COUNTERMEASURES.

To avoid a dystopian future like that caused by an atomic war, humanity needs, within the next 30 years and no more, to get an unlimited and inexhaustible source of energy. Practically, once the energy plants are built, energy production must be at a cost close to zero, and not pollute or produce waste of any kind.
And this unlimited amount is not obtained with devices such as wind blades or solar panels, but only with the FUSION OF HYDROGEN ATOMS. Clean energy in unlimited quantities at very low cost.

We are not far from the possibility of doing this. But it's needed:

  1. DEVELOPMENT OF STATE-OF-THE-ART NUCLEAR FISSION POWER STATIONS TO ADDRESS THE NEXT DECADES.
  2. STUDY AND EXPERIMENTATION OF THE TECHNOLOGY OF NUCLEAR FUSION OF HYDROGEN ATOMS, THE WIDEST ELEMENT AVAILABLE ON NATURE
  3. THE REPLACEMENT - WITHIN THE NEXT FIFTY YEARS - OF THE FISSION NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS TO FUSION, AND THE STUDY OF FUSION DEVICES ALSO OF VERY REDUCED DIMENSIONS FOR CIVIL USE BY COMMON PEOPLE.

GLOBALIZATION AND HUMAN HEALTH

Similarly, given the unstoppable phenomenon of migrations of entire populations, I believe that the problem of the probable future spread of diseases of viral origin CANNOT BE solved exclusively with the vaccines development.
WE NEED DRUGS ACTING AGAINST A LARGE VIRUSES KINDS, AS ANTIBIOTICS DO FOR BACTERIA, TO BE SUPPLIED THROUGH THE TERRITORIAL HEALTH HOME SYSTEM.

UNTIL NOW IT SEEMS THAT STUPIDITY IS PREVAILING:: they get kids to speak at the UN assembly and pretend to applaud dummies who knows nothing and repeat clichés that who knows who - we really know - has suggested them; and those who supported sending dummies to speak nonsense, perhaps to propitiate enriching themselves with self-proclaimed renewable and inadequate energies.
On the other hand, in public health matters, many authorities in charge of public health do not activate basic medicine system and generally do not allow the extensive use of effective antiviral drugs already available.

Stefano Pelloni
 No fear! the mercy of jesus
is infinite

THE WORLD HANGS FROM A WIRE. In addition to the recovery of rationality and logic, and the renunciation of the affected by ideological flaws reasoning, the recovery of religiosity is necessary.

Quos Deus perdere vult
dementat prius

 

 

by Berto Lunizzi November, 17, 2021
Note: Greta knows she why the month I wrote the article is called November?