CHRONICLE'S NEWS AND HISTORY
Events can be called historical after that the chronicle has forgotten them

Chronicle (ant. Chronic) [from lat. Chronica pl. neutral (in middleages lat. it became fem. sing.), from the Greeck χρονικά (βιβλία) 'annals, chronicles, neutral pl. of χρονικός 'about time'] is the chronological ordered narration of facts (with no attempt at interpretation or critique about events). Which is the primitive form of historical narrative and therefore is the beginning history of all peoples. The chronicle gets particular importance in the Middle Ages. With reference to the modern and contemporary, the term is sometimes used with reductive value:

  • exposure to simple facts, not enlightened by the knowledge of a historical problem, as opposed to the story.
  • Newspaper articles in which one relates the everyday lifeevents of a city or special environments: town chronicle, policy chr., Parliamentary chr. ; literary chr., artistic, judicial, theater, sports, fashion, etc .; a news story; page of chronicle ; black chronicle, which covers crimes, thefts, scandals; . white chronicle, local petty news' information; pink chronicle, that is the one dealing with the characters from the entertainment's world, or more generally the private lives of public figures (in the past, mundane or gallant chronicles); facts, news stories, etc etc ...

Chronicle's records should have a certain detachment by emotions and interests and be as objective as possible. Instead, refererring to the actual moral degeneration, the chronicle is frequently something that does spread misinformation and dirty gossips, puts to shame and discredit, and often defames, but today more and more often persecutes the object of its attentions.
Under the pretext of press freedom and information's right, certain powerful groups use press and media to damage and take advantages upon their political or economical opponents.
In Italy, the factionalism has always been connoted common since ancient times, but never in the past as does it happen in recent decades the decency and common sense were so much despised.

Whether or not one doesn't want, If the truth is not known, everything that policy accordingly does for the common good or is hypocrisy or is wrong.
What is wrong it can only lead to harmful side effects and, if done by hypocrisy - morally wrong - sooner or later it shall also produce greatest negative effects.
I believe possible to find and describe the events' reasons and historical background, trying to re-establish the truth, distorted by political or religious interests, or even distorted by materialism's myths and stereotypes, by the subjectivity of relativism, and by the special interests of powerful economic groups.
This can be accomplished by reviewing current events, and publishing well written documented and reasoned articles, and any useful material to the specific purpose.
To recognize the possible truth's degenerations, do not give up the real historical criticism applied to the chronicle, in the sense of rational analysis of the statements of historical facts of the matter, to learn more and tend to the formation of an independent judgment. An example of this can be the analisys of the actual Europe's invasion by illegal immigration, in relation to other historical analogous events.

For our purposes we are framing the European history for convenience roughly into four periods, since many historians will give different subdivisions.

  1. Ancient History: that is the period (lasting about 4000 years) starting from the pre-classical history, preceding the appearance of Greek-Roman sources, coming to the classical one (ancient Greece and Rome), and ending with the fall of the Western Roman Empire and the barbarian's invasions.
  2. History of the Middle Ages, which includes the period from 500 to 1500 AD, ending with the fall of the Byzantine Empire (or Eastern Roman Empire). The term "Middle Ages" appears for the first time in the fifteenth century in Latin and reflects the opinion of contemporaries that this period would represent a deviation from the classical culture, and as opposed to the Renaissance.
  3. Modern History, which includes a period of three centuries from 1500 to around 1800 (the French Revolution Napoleon Bonaparte, the Vienna's Congress).
  4. Contemporary history that starts from 1800 and is made to end very different between the various historians in the twentieth century up today.

Events can be called historical after that the chronicle has forgotten them, and only then events can be written by documental reasoned basis.
When we write here, we do not mean to be professional historians - though we should not hold us up, I say to myself, to be the modest subject's amateurs and even simple storytellers. However the respect for historians must be great, since without their research and their work is almost impossible to know or assume the facts of the past.

CORRECTIONS AND ADDITIONS GLADLY ACCEPTED