CHEMICAL WEAPONS IN MIDDLE EAST
There were or were not there? There are or aren't there ?
The recent news about Syria - we are in April of 2017 - tells us that the Saddam infamous nerve gas existed and continue to exist, even if one doesn't know who still supplies them to the criminals who use it
 A couple of years ago, I did learn from a TG about a ship wearing similar junk that had reached the Italian Gioia Tauro harbour, and was taken over by a specialized company responsible for neutralizing the dangerous cargo.
A few days ago, a Syrian aircraft bombed a rebel base belonging to infamous Arab criminal association called Al Qaeda. It was said that the bombs did strike a weapons depot where the rebels to the central government held a stockpile of nerve gas.
The fact had touched everyone because they were many children dead, and then the United States had reacted by throwing about half hundred missiles on the Syrian air base, killing some civilians and children too. Let me make then some observations:
  • why at the time of the second Gulf War it was said that the chemical weapons which had justified the attack on the regime of Saddam Hussein did not exist? Instead there, existed because otherwise, one doesn't understand where the ship full of crap did jump off to Gioia Tauro from Syria. And why and how now the Al Qaeda rebels have nerve gas ?
  • How is it that at the time the President George Bush and the British Prime Minister were accused of being liars? It seems that the secret services were right for once.
  • Since it does not seem that the Syrian president is such an idiot as to expose voluntarily himself to Western and American reprisals and indignation of public opinion, who is to blame if the nerve gases are blown up? It belongs to whom bombed the rebel base and hit the arms depot, or who did store it? It is also justified the suspect that someome made to be received the info by the Syrian army about the location of the weapons warehouse on purpose to cause a carnage. These people have no respect for children and women, as we know well .
  • Why the US administration has reacted in a dramatic way, throwing many missiles of which only twenty have been said to have reached the target? Unless the President Donald Trump is more naive than Barack Obama or has been wickedly deceived by his employees, alto if it is clear that such a move has silenced the criticism of American democratic warmongers. It seems that Americans like to wage war in the name of 'democracy', only addressing against those who believe to be weaker. Let me see if sometimes they take it against Saudi Arabia.
Now if all this is true, it seems clear that the reality does not want to be known, and everything that happens as a result is a hypocrisy, or it is a mistake. In both cases, the effects can only be unwanted or harmful. Furthermore about U.S. :
  • How can afford to talk about war crimes who has used napalm, phosphorous bombs chemical herbicides, and who knows what other hell gadgets?
  • In World War II their grandfathers have trampled and despised my country bombarding Pompeii archaeological sites, cemeteries, and places of art and roaming with their Jeeps inside the halls of the Caserta's Royal Palace. They destroyed an ancient medieval abbey, with carpet bombings they have claimed the lives of 200,000 civilians, and sometimes killed Italian unarmed soldiers and militiamen who had surrendered. And let's not speak of the destroyed cities.
  • I bet if it was convenient, also they would use nerve gases as they once did with atomic bombs on two Japanese cities.
  • They say they have helped and protected us from the communists, until the fall of the Berlin Wall. That's true, forgetting that they had been waiting for ( the good old Uncle Joe ) Stalin's troops until they arrived in Berlin. Let's not speak about other nonsenses that got so many troubles and casualties mainly to their same citizens
  • I can remember that in Vietnam the good J. F. Kennedy did propitiate the the 'dictator' Diem assassination, of the one who kept firmly in hand the destiny of his country, giving free way to corruption and communist assault. This foolishness did cause the defeat in a bloody war with many casualties, even if the USA had the enormous military power ever?

ONLY GOD KNOWS WHAT WILL HAPPEN NOW AND WOE THEY WILL COMBINE
It comforts me to think that
the worst troubles were almost always combined by democratic presidents

GUYS, I CONFESS THAT I DON'T KNOW IF I'M MORE AFRAID OF U.S. OR OF RUSSIA!