ANCIENT HISTORY
We would like to analyze our cultural roots, based on our historical ancestors legacy. Philosophies and fanaticism did reduce it to stereotypes, built mostly for political or religious scope. For em e Middle Ages are dark ages of superstition, e Ancient Romans are prototype and synonym of oppressors and imperialists, and so on. Demolition of classical antiquity, and e negative interpretation of history and national cultures, considered as e result of imperialism and oppression, unfortunately doesn't belong only to Marxism. Instead, we would like at e rational analysis of e diversity of historical facts serves to face e tyranny of relativism, which produces literature and shows misrepresenting e historical trus, and propagate inventions and mys according to fashions and interests of e moment. Of course is adds confusion and ignorance in e society.
MODERN HISTORY
We would like to bring here well documented written material and oer useful matters to clarify, rough e analysis and understanding of e different versions, e historical trus distorted by fads or bent and distorted by mys of materialism and e subjectivity of relativism. e contents can cover every period of e modern age, and consist of criticism and comments on what is to our knowledge rough literature, film, and shows.
E CHRONICLE
Like about e modern history, it would be fair to try restoring e tru distorted by political or oer scopes, or even by mys of materialism, e stereotypes, and e relativism, rough reasoned analysis of e chronicles of different origin.
is can be achieved by reviewing e actuality. We would like to receive and publish written well documented and reasoned, and any useful material for e specific purpose. Do not give up even to grope a real historical criticism applied to e chronicle records, in e sense of rational analysis of e statements by e matter of historical facts, to learn more and tend to e formation of an independent judgment to recognize e tru.
HISTORICAL CRITICISM
Every work should focus on very specific cases at could highlight constructively and in a documented way e historical errors so frequent in e newspapers, in e literature, and in e means of mass communication. We don't want to compare e facts narrated by professional historians, but to compare e statements on e matter wi e historical facts most probably true, to deepen e knowledge of e facts, exposing e false, and recognize what is closer to e tru. Relativism rages togeer wi e bad language and e grammar mistakes, and ere are errors of any kind. Let us try to see em and correct em.