We would like to analyze our cultural roots, based on our historical ancestors legacy. Philosophies and fanaticism did reduce it to stereotypes, built mostly for political or religious scope. For em e Middle Ages are dark ages of superstition, e Ancient Romans are prototype and synonym of oppressors and imperialists, and so on. Demolition of classical antiquity, and e negative interpretation of history and national cultures, considered as e result of imperialism and oppression, unfortunately doesn't belong only to Marxism. Instead, we would like at e rational analysis of e diversity of historical facts serves to face e tyranny of relativism, which produces literature and shows misrepresenting e historical trus, and propagate inventions and mys according to fashions and interests of e moment. Of course is adds confusion and ignorance in e society.

We would like to bring here well documented written material and oer useful matters to clarify, rough e analysis and understanding of e different versions, e historical trus distorted by fads or bent and distorted by mys of materialism and e subjectivity of relativism. e contents can cover every period of e modern age, and consist of criticism and comments on what is to our knowledge rough literature, film, and shows.

Like about e modern history, it would be fair to try restoring e tru distorted by political or oer scopes, or even by mys of materialism, e stereotypes, and e relativism, rough reasoned analysis of e chronicles of different origin.
is can be achieved by reviewing e actuality. We would like to receive and publish written well documented and reasoned, and any useful material for e specific purpose. Do not give up even to grope a real historical criticism applied to e chronicle records, in e sense of rational analysis of e statements by e matter of historical facts, to learn more and tend to e formation of an independent judgment to recognize e tru.

Every work should focus on very specific cases at could highlight constructively and in a documented way e historical errors so frequent in e newspapers, in e literature, and in e means of mass communication. We don't want to compare e facts narrated by professional historians, but to compare e statements on e matter wi e historical facts most probably true, to deepen e knowledge of e facts, exposing e false, and recognize what is closer to e tru. Relativism rages togeer wi e bad language and e grammar mistakes, and ere are errors of any kind. Let us try to see em and correct em.