LITERARY ACTUALITY.
It is obvious that not everyone can win a Nobel Prize for Literature, and becasue they gave it to a strolling player like Dario Fo, for his 'funny mystery', such an award is even no more mark of distinction, but today it seems that in the literature almost everything is decaying for intelligence and content.
To quote someone, even in the stories / novels by the italian writer Andrea Camilleri, who has certainly not the Pirandello's stature, but he did produce work in itself anything but trivial or unintelligent, scattered here and there we find politically qualifying banality , tending to misrepresent the reader's idea through judgments flatly-spotted in the dialogues between the characters. It is often clarified, as anacolute among the story, that the sympathetic intelligent and wise protagonist, all of a piece, and very humane, appreciates the 'politically correct'.
The writer pleases the common fashion, suggesting that cops beat the poor and the helpless, their boss is always stupid, then fascist, then even when not corrupt, he's supine to the powerful, and so on.
In the pleasant consumable literature for the general public, one finds fashionable works of certain authors, mostly anglosaxons.These are apparently cobbled together, which clearly show that they were co-written by more than one bribed people and, due to that, many obvious contradictions in the story can be often found; such books contain always wild inventions and fables and explicit pruderies and obscenities; teem 'pruderies' explicit and obscenity; mostly there are nonsenses, strung in the story with the intention of undermining all base in the human spiritual, and attacking those who obstruct the fashion of relativism. The extraordinary success and spread of these works tells us how regressed and decayed is some literature and the taste of some readers. It's better toread crap or not read at all?
The influence of fashion of being marxist, that in recent times it's of fake marxism, has pervaded the society for more than two centuries, in synergistic way to relativism, and unfortunately still this mode is alive bringing in the literature the religious-like tendentiousness inherent in that obsolete ideal, perhaps even by those who are not marxist. The current style of writing of history, politics and philosophy, does not fail to subtly deform the truth (as the reader or listener is not careful and if he drink it, or is already convinced and then a believer) or sometimes even brazenly.
The basic theme or obsession both of the true typical Marxist or the quasi-Marxist, is the need to demolish and destroy their political opponents, or even the dissenters, all looked as mortal enemy.
In literature and on talk shows they use weapons such as the wise pity smiling that serves to ail the opponent; attributing coarseness, or ignorance to those who do not think like you; giving them the corrupt, or stupid, or incapable; giving them the entry to not make them talk in conversations and debates; to highlight certain facts and problems of society, in an exaggerated way, and particularly in citing bogus data.
Against that which is opposed to their ideal they always do that, even when individually they are good cultured and calm people. And if they do it in the pleasant literature, let alone if they have propagated and propagate false history still today, formalized in the teaching of all levels.
It is therefore important to read everything and everyone, without prejudice or bias, if you want to try to challenge the wrong things and recover beauty and return to less dingy visions and practices.
We have to understand appreciating what deserves it, but always to struggle against the relativism tyranny, that misrepresents and makes subjective and cheapens everything and every aspect of life, and certainly does not fail to afflict literature. And this can only be done by writing and making propaganda against it.
Powerful power groups restrict the exercise of democracy and monopolize the economy, others touting and harmful and immoral costumes, corrupt the youth from an early age, even through commercial advertising.
Besides, trying to direct public opinion towards their interests, they use the mass communication means to damage and supplant their competitors and opponents. The end justifies the means, it seems to be the watchword. What a wonderful teaching!
With more or less frequency and awareness, to the public are transmitted errors and negative messages imbued with 'correct' concepts, due to relativism that rages. Because of the interest that for the most part are on the side of those who recognize themselves in certain political parties, or in Italy even due to partisanship inherent that people, it's almost always impossible to know the truth in any event.
Catastrophism, environmentalism, disasters, crime, poverty, and corruption, real or imaginary, are used as weapons to conquer 'audience' and market shares.
Who's then sided with the so-called 'political left', still has great advantages, he is protected in every way, and he's saved almost always by difficulties of every kind, perhaps at the expense of the different political orientation competitors.
And what do we do? We would like to highlight and fight, in our small, the distortions of past and present, to remember what is in our opinion the truthfulness and uprightness, and to bring out the bad language and grammar errors of communicators. (Please here include me too among them, as the english one isn't my mother language).
Today there are available even University degrees in science of communication: then how is possible the actual language decay? How can be the ignorance of elements of general culture that is so often found? Because these are things that do not generate abruptly, but that takes a long time to establish itself, let's try to ask why into ourselves.